Interactive Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria on Nodulation, Growth and Yield of Soybean Under Field Conditions

Abstract

Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill), a major source of edible oil and protein, is a globally important legume; microbial inoculation offers a sustainable approach to enhance its productivity while reducing reliance on chemical fertilizers. A two-year field experiment was conducted during the kharif seasons for evaluation of the interactive effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on nodulation, nutrient uptake, growth, and yield of soybean (cv. JS 95-60). The experiment was carried out in a randomized block design using a mixed AMF inoculum (Glomus intraradices, G. geosporum, and G. mosseae), two PGPR strains-Paenibacillus polymyxa (HKA-15, IARI) and Burkholderia arboris (NSRI) and their combinations. Nodulation, leghaemoglobin content, and mycorrhizal colonization were assessed at 50% flowering, while nutrient uptake and grain yield were recorded at harvest. Across both years, microbial inoculation significantly improved nodulation, mycorrhizal colonization, nitrogen uptake, and grain yield as compared to uninoculated control. Co-inoculation of AMF with P. polymyxa consistently recorded the highest nodule number, nodule biomass, leghaemoglobin content, and shoot nitrogen uptake, demonstrating a strong synergistic interaction. AMF alone recorded the highest root colonization and significantly increased grain nitrogen content and total nitrogen uptake during the first year. In the second year, AMF + P. polymyxa also achieved the highest phosphorus uptake and grain yield, while B. arboris alone improved grain nitrogen and phosphorus content. During the first year, although AMF + P. polymyxa exhibited increased nodulation and nutrient acquisition, grain yield was statistically non-significant with AMF + B. arboris. Numerically, AMF + B. arboris recorded the highest yield (1058.51 kg ha⁻¹; 54.06% above the control), followed by AMF + P. polymyxa (1004.42 kg ha⁻¹; 46.19% above the control). These findings demonstrated the compatibility between microbial partners and is more critical than inoculant diversity for maximizing soybean productivity and highlight the potential of AMF_PGPR co-inoculation as a sustainable biofertilizer strategy for enhancing nutrient use efficiency, yield, and soil health.

Keywords

References

1. [1]Agnihotri R, Mathimaran N, Sharma MP, Sahu A, and Bhattacharjya s (2024) Production methods of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculum: Challenges and future perspectives In: Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Sustainable Agriculture: Inoculum Production and Application, M. Parihar et al. (eds.) Pages: 381-399. Springer Nature Singapore Pte 381 Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0296-1_17
2. [2]Agnihotri R, Pandey A, Sharma MP*, Prakash A, Ramesh A, Maheshwari HS, Verma RK, Nargund R, and Billore SD (2024) “Enhanced soil carbon storage and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal biomass in a long-term nutrient management under soybean-based cropping system” Environment Science & Pollution Research (2024); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-35490-1
3. [3]Barea J.M., Pozo M.J., Azcón R., Azcón-Aguilar C. (2005). Microbial co-operation in the rhizosphere. Journal of Experimental Botany, 56: 1761-1778
4. [4]Barea, J.M. and Jeffries, P., 1995. Arbuscular mycorrhizas in sustainable soil plant systems. In: A. Varma and B. Hock (Editors), Mycorrhiza Structure, Function, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 521-560.
5. [5]Bashan Y, Holguin G (1998) Proposal for the division of plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria into two classifications: biocontrol-PGPB (plant growth-promoting bacteria) and PGPB. Soil Biol Biochem 30: 1225-1228
6. [6]Bianciotto V, Lumini E, Bonfante P,VandammeP (2003) Candidatus Glomeribacter gigasporarum gen. nov., sp. nov., an endosymbiont of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Int J Sys Evol 53:121-124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02382-0
7. [7]Biermann B and Linderman RG (1981) Quantifying vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizae: a proposed method towards standardization. New Phytol. 87: 63–67
8. [8]Chourasiya D, Ramesh A, Maheshwari HS, Anil Prakash, Drijber R, and Sharma MP (2024) Mass production of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the sorghum plants inoculated with Burkholderia arboris using soybean mill waste and vermicompost-amended soil-sand substrate. Current Microbiology 81:129; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-024-03662-4
9. [9]Chourasiya et al. (2024). Demonstrated that Burkholderia arboris significantly enhances AM fungal multiplication and propagule production, confirming its role as a compatible mycorrhiza-helper bacterium.
10. [10]Dobrzyński J., Nazięblo A. (2024). Paenibacillus as a Biocontrol Agent for Fungal Phytopathogens: Is P. polymyxa the Only One Worth Attention? Microbial Ecology, 87:134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-024-02450-8
11. [11]Fernández MC, Boem GHF, Rubio G (2011) Effect of indigenous mycorrhizal colonization on phosphorus-acquisition efficiency in soybean and sunflower. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 174: 673-677
12. [12]Garbaye J (1994) Helper bacteria: a new dimension to the mycorrhizal symbiosis (Tansley Review, 76) New Phytol 128:197-210. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2558315
13. [13]Garbaye, J. (1994). Tansley Review No. 76. Helper bacteria: A new dimension to the mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytologist, 128(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb04003.x
14. [14]Huang X., et al. (2024). Exopolysaccharides of Paenibacillus polymyxa: A review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 261:129663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129663
15. [15]Jackson M L. 1973. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA
16. [16]Kloepper, J. W. 1993. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as biological control agents. Pages 255-274 in: Soil Microbial Ecology: Applications in Agricultural and Environmental Management. F. B. Metting, Jr., ed. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, USA.
17. [17]Labbe JL, Weston DJ, Dunkirk N, Pelletier DA, Tuskan GA (2014) Newly identified helper bacteria stimulate ectomycorrhizal formation in Populus. Front Plant Sci 5:579. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00579
18. [18]Labbé, J. L., Weston, D. J., Dunkirk, N., Pelletier, D. A., & Tuskan, G. A. (2014). Newly identified helper bacteria stimulate ectomycorrhizal formation in Populus. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5, 579. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00579
19. [19]Oliveira CA, Alves VMC, Marriel IE, Gomes EA, Scotti MR, Carneiro NP, Guimaraces CT, Schaffert RE, Sá NMH (2009) Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms isolated from rhizosphere of maize cultivated in an oxisol of the Brazilian Cerrado Biome. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 41: 1782–1787
20. [20]Olsen, S., Cole, C., Watanabe, F., Dean, L., 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. U. S. Dep. Agric. Circ. No. 93 1–19.
21. [21]Phillips DA and Hayman DS (1970) Improved procedures for clearing roots and Staining parasitic and vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 55:158-161
22. [22]Ramesh, A, Sushil K. Sharma, Mahaveer P.Sharma, Namrata Yadav and Om P. Joshi. (2014a). Plant Growth-Promoting Traits in Enterobacter cloacae subsp. dissolvens MDSR9 Isolated from Soybean Rhizosphere and its Impact on Growth and Nutrition of Soybean and Wheat Upon inoculation. Agricultural Research 3(1):53-66.
23. [23]Ramesh, A. Sushil K. Sharma, Mahaveer P.Sharma, Namrata Yadav and Om P. Joshi. (2014). Inoculation of zinc solubilizing Bacillus aryabhattai strains for improved growth, mobilization and biofortification of zinc in soybean and wheat cultivated in Vertisols of central India. Applied Soil Ecology 73: 87– 96.
24. [24]Ranjan P, Das D, Bundela V, Ramesh A, Verma RK, Nargund R, Manandhar U, Drijber R, Upadhyay RK and Sharma MP (2026) Role of rhizosphere specific microbiome in enhancing soybean productivity across contrasting soil and crop management systems. Front. Plant Sci. 17:1830235. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2026.1830235
25. [25]Richardson, A.E. (2001) Prospects for using soil microorganisms to improve the acquisition of phosphorus by plants. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 28: 897–906.
26. [26]Roesti D, Ineichen K, Braissant O, Redecker D, Wiemken A, Aragno M (2005) Bacteria associated with spores of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Glomus geosporum and Glomus constrictum. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:6673-6679. doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.11.6673-6679.2005
27. [27]SAS Institute Inc (1991). SAS/STAT User's Guide, release 6.03. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.
28. [28]Sharma MP, Jaisighani K, Sharma SK, and Bhatia VS (2012) Effect of native soybean rhizobia and AM fungi in the improvement of nodulation, growth, soil enzymes and physiological status of soybean under microcosm conditions. Agricultural Research 1(4):346–351 (DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-012-0038-2
29. [29]Sharma MP, Singh S, Sharma SK, Ramesh A, Bhatia VS (2016) Co-inoculation of resident AM fungi and soybean rhizobia enhanced nodulation, yield, soil biological parameters and saved fertilizer inputs in Vertisols under microcosm and field conditions. Soybean Research 14(2): 39-53.
30. [30]Tabatabai MA and Bremner JM (1969) Use of P-Nitrophenyl phosphate assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol. and Biochem. 1:301-307
31. [31]Tariq H, Subramanian S, Geitmann A and Smith DL (2025) Bacillus and Paenibacillus as plant growth-promoting bacteria in soybean and cannabis. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1529859. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1529859
32. [32]Walkley A. 1935. An examination of methods for determining organic carbon and nitrogen in soils. Journal of Agricultural Science 25: 598-609.
33. [33]Xavier LJ, Germida JJ (2003) Bacteria associated with Glomus clarum spores influence mycorrhizal activity. Soil Biol Biochem 35:471-478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00003-8
34. [34]Xavier, L. J. C., & Germida, J. J. (2003). Bacteria associated with Glomus clarum spores influence mycorrhizal activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35(3), 471–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00003-8
35. [35]Zahir ZA, Arshad M, Frankenberger WT (2004) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: applications and perspectives in agriculture. Advances in Agronomy 81: 97–168.