Bio-physical and Bio-chemical Basis of Host Plant Resistance of Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] Genotypes Against Spodoptera litura (Fabricius)

Khushbu Kumawat; Shivpal Solanki; Lokesh Kumar Meena; DK Suryawanshi; Anand Harshana

doi:10.53550/sr.v23.i1.110

Loading article…

Loading page…

Bio-physical and Bio-chemical Basis of Host Plant Resistance of Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] Genotypes Against Spodoptera litura (Fabricius)

Khushbu Kumawat, Shivpal Solanki, Lokesh Kumar Meena, DK Suryawanshi, Anand Harshana

DOI: 10.53550/sr.v23.i1.110

Published 9/19/2026 · pp. 65–73

PDF1.0 MB

Abstract

A field trial was conducted to evaluate the field resistance against Spodoptera litura in eighteen genotypes of soybean at Research Farm of Department of Entomology, ICAR- Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore (M.P.) during the Kharif 2024. The results revealed that six genotypes viz., CAT-146, G5P22, CAT-47, F4P21, F3P18, and CAT 2503 found effective to combat the menace of S. litura, resulted in minimum larval population. Further, biochemical and biophysical analysis found highest phenol content (CAT-47: 23.13 mg/g), peroxidase (CAT-146: 0.75 min-1g-1), polyphenol (CAT-146: 0.32 min-1g-1), phenylalanine ammonia lyase (F4P21: 1.73 mg/g), protein (CAT-146 and CAT-47: 3.95 mg/g), trichome density on midrib (F4P21: 35.9 mm2), leaf blade (CAT 2503: 33.5 mm2), and leaf lamina (CAT 2503: 33.1 mm2), and specific leaf weight (CAT-146 and CAT-2503: 0.41 g/cm2) for resistant genotypes. On contrary, the susceptible genotypes had higher reducing sugar (JS335: 29.36 mg/g), relative water content (JS335: 34.35 %), chlorophyll a (JS 93-05: 21.52 mg g-1 fw), chlorophyll b (JS 93-05: 13.59 mg g-1 fw) and total chlorophyll (JS 93-05: 35.11 mg g-1 fw). These biophysical and biochemical components in soybean can be effectively utilized in breeding for resistance against S. litura. The larval population of S. litura has shown significant positive correlation with reducing sugar (0.751**), relative water content (0.871**), chlorophyll A (0.668**), chlorophyll B (0.698) and total chlorophyll (0.707**), while significant negative correlation was observed for phenol (-0.710**), peroxidase (-0.647**), polyphenol oxidase (-0.637**), protein (-0.771**), trichome density midrib (-0.695**), leaf blade (-0.742**), leaf lamina (-0.779**) and specific leaf weight (-0.594**). Non-significant correlation was observed between S. litura larval population and PAL (-0.504).

References

[1]Anonymous (2023). Soybean Outlook – September 2023. Agricultural Market Intelligence Centre, PJTSAU 1p.

[2]Ahirwar, R.; Devi, P. and Gupta, R. (2015). Seasonal incidence of major insect-pest and their biocontrol agent of soybean crop (Glycine max L. Mirrill). Sci. Res. Essays 10(12): 402-406.

[3]Anchala, N.; Neeta, G. and Preeti, S. (2015). Morphological parameters of soybean plant resistance to lepidopterous defoliators. J. Hill Agri. 6(1): 89-92.

[4]Armes, N.J.; Wightman, J.A.; Jadhav, D.R. and Ranga Rao, G.V. (1997). Status of insecticide resistance in Spodoptera litura in Andhra Pradesh, India. Pesticide Sci. 50(3): 240-248.

[5]Awasthi, M.; Sharma, A.N. and Singh, R.N. (2003). Screening of soybean genotypes for resistance against three major insect-pests. M.Sc. (Ag.) thesis, RVSKVV, College of agriculture, indore (M.P.) 44pp.

[6]Barbehenn, R.; Dukatz, C.; Holt, C.; Reese, A.; Martiskainen, O.; Salminen, J.P. and Constabel, C.P. (2010). Feeding on poplar leaves by caterpillars potentiates foliar peroxidase action in their guts and increases plant resistance. Oecologia 164: 993-1004.

[7]Bi, J.L.; Felton, G.W. and Mueller, A.J. (1994). Induced resistance in soybean to Helicoverpa zea: role of plant protein quality. J. Chem. Ecol. 20: 183-198.

[8]Biswas, G.C. (2013). Insect pests of soybean (Glycine max L.) their nature of damage and succession with the crop stages. J. Asiat. Soc. Bangladesh Sci. 39(1): 1-8.

[9]Bhonwong, A.; Stout, M.J.; Attajarusit, J. and Tantasawat, P. (2009). Defensive role of tomato Polyphenol oxidase against cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) and Beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua). J. Chem. Ecol. 35: 28–38.

[10]Bray, H.G. and Thorpe, W.V. (1954). Analysis of phenolic compounds of interest in metabolism. Methods biochem. Anal. 1: 27-52.

[11]Campos-Vargas, R. and Saltveit, M.E. (2002). Involvement of putative chemical wound signals in the induction of phenolic metabolism in wounded lettuce. Physiol. Plant. 114(1): 73-84.

[12]Chari, M.S. and Patel, N.G. (1988). Cotton leaf worm Spodoptera litura Fabricius, its biology and integrated control measures. Cotton Dev. 13(1): 7–8.

[13]Chowdary, K.S. and Katlam, B.P. (2023). Physio-morpho and biochemical basis of resistence in soybean germplasms against Spodoptera litura (Fabricius). Pharm. Innov. J. 12(8): 1010-1016.

[14]Dhaliwal, G.S. and R, Singh, (2005). Host Plant Resistance to Insects: Concepts and Applications. Panima Pub. Corp., New Delhi, pp578.

[15]Dar, S.A.; Rather, B.A.; Wani, A.R. and Ganie, M.A. (2017). Resistance against insect pests by plant phenolics and their derivative compounds. Chem. Sci. Rev. Lett. 6(22): 1073-1081.

[16]Dickerson, D.P. et al (1984). Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and hydroxycinnamate: CoA ligase in maize mesocotyls inoculated with Helminthosporium maydis or Helminthosporium carbonum. Physiol. plant patho. 25(2): 111-123.

[17]Deither, V.G. (1953). Chemoreception In: Insect Physiology, (Eds. Reeder, K. D.), John Willey Publishers, New York, pp544-576.

[18]EPPO (2013). PQR database: European and Mediterranean plant protection organization, Paris, http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm.

[19]Fletcher, T.B. (1922). Report of the imperial entomologist. Scientific Report, Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, pp. 41–59.

[20]Gill, R.; Gupta, A.; Taggar, G. and Taggar, M. (2010). Role of oxidative enzymes in plant defenses against insect herbivory. Acta. Phytopathol. Entomol. Hung. 45(2): 277-290.

[21]Guo, T.W.; Liao, C.T. and Chuang, W.P. (2019). Defensive responses of rice cultivars resistant to Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Arthropod Plant Interact. 13(4): 611-620.

[22]Hafeez, A.; Ahmad, S.J.N.; Ahmad, J.N.; Tipu, M.I. and Malik, T.A. (2020). Evaluation of biochemical defense response to Spodoptera litura infestation in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) genotypes.

[23]Halder, J.; Srinivasan, S. and Muralikrishna, T. (2006). Biochemical basis of resistance to spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) in Mungbean. J. Entomol. Res. 30(4): 313-316.

[24]Harish, G.R.; Palil, H. and Patil, P.V. (2009). Identification of resistant sources to major defoliator pests of soybean. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 22(1): 215-217.

[25]Haralu, S.; Karabhantanal, S. S.; Naidu, G. K. and Jagginavar, S. B. (2018). Biophysical and biochemical basis of resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in chickpea. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud.6(5): 873-878.

[26]Ihsan-ul-Haq, Amjad, M.; Kakakhel, S.A. and Khokhar, M.A. (2001). Morphological and physiological parameters of soybean resistance to insect pests. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2(2): 202-204.

[27]Kalyan, R.K. and Ameta, O.P. (2017). Effect of sowing time and varieties on incidence of insect pests of soybean. J. Entomol. Zool Stud. 5(2): 790-794.

[28]Khattab, H. and Khattab, M. (2005). Responses of Eucalypt trees to the insect feeding (Gall-forming psyllid). Int. J. Agric. Biol. 7(6): 979–984.

[29]Kramer, P.J. (1983). Water deficits and plant growth. Water Relation of Plant, Academic Press, 342-389.

[30]Kumar, K.S.; Khan, P.A.; (1982). Peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase in excised ragi during senescence. Indian J. Exper. Biol. 20: 412–416.

[31]Lakshmi Narayanan, S.; Singh, P.S. and Mishra, D.S. (2008). Relationship between whitefly population, YMV disease and morphological parameters of green gram germplasm. Environ. Ecol. 26(3): 978-982.

[32]Lowry, O.H.; Rosebroiugh, N.J.; Farr, A.L. and Randall, R.J. (1951). Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193(1): 265-275.

[33]Mahanil, S. et al (2008). Overexpression of tomato polyphenol oxidase increases resistance to common cutworm. Plant sci. 174(4): 456-466.

[34]Martoliya, H.; Gaur, N. and Chaudhary, P. (2013). Evaluation of germplasms against insect pests of soybean. Bioinfolet- A Quarterly J. Life Sci. 10(1b): 241-245.

[35]Matti, M.V. and Deotale, R.O. (2017). Impact of weather parameters on abundance of major defoliators of soybean. Int. J. Plant Prot. 10(1): 75-78.

[36]Mohammad, S.A. et al (2019). Biophysical and biochemical mechanism of resistance to Spodoptera litura in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 7(4): 86-96.

[37]Munakata, K. (1977). Insect antifeedants of Spodoptera litura in plants. In: (Eds.) Hedin, P.A. Host Plant Resistance to Pests, American Chemical Society, Washington, 185-196 pp.

[38]Nazeem, J. (2011). Biophysical and biochemical basis of induced resistance against soybean pest nourished with organics. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.

[39]Nelson, N. (1944). A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for the determination of glucose. J. biol. Chem. 153(2): 375-380.

[40]Niranjankumar, B.V. and Regupathy, A. (2001). Status of insecticide resistance in tobacco caterpilar Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) in Tamil Nadu. Pesti. Res. J. 13: 86–89.

[41]Oerke, E.C. (2006). Crop losses to pests. J. Agric. Sci. 144: 31–43.

[42]Painter, R.H. (1951). Insect Resistance in Crop Plants. MacMillan Company, 23-53.

[43]Prasad, M.N.R. (2003). Genetic enhancement of host plant resistances to Spodoptera litura (Fab.) in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Ph.D. (Agri.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.

[44]Prasad, M.N.R. and Gowda, M.V.C (2006). Mechanisms of resistance to tobacco cutworm (Spodoptera litura) and their implications to screening for resistance in groundnut. Euphytica. 149: 387-399.

[45]Punithavalli, M.; Sharma, A.N. and Rajkumar, M.B. (2014). Seasonality of the common cutworm Spodoptera litura in a soybean ecosystem. Phytoparasitica 42: 213-222.

[46]Rani, P.U. and Pratyusha, S. (2013). Defensive role of Gossypium hirsutum L. anti-oxidative enzymes and phenolic acids in response to Spodoptera litura F. feeding. J. Asia. Pac. Entomol. 16(2): 131-136.

[47]Rahman, M.S.; Vijayalakshmi, K.; Durga Rani, C.V.; Ameer, B.S. and Srinivas, C. (2021). Morphological and Biochemical Bases of Resistance of Some Groundnut Germplasms against Tobacco Caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) and Leaf Miner, Aproaerema modicella (Deventer). Int. J. Environ. Clim.11(12): 195-204.

[48]Radford, D.J. (1967). Growth analysis formulae: Their use and abuse. Crop Sci. 7: 171-175.

[49]Retig, N. (1974). Change in peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase associated with natural and induced resistance of tomato to Fusarium wilt. Physio. Pl. Pathol. 4: 145–150.

[50]Sasane, A.R.; Bhalkare, S.K.; Rathod, P.K. and Undirwade, D.B. (2018). Biophysical basis of resistance in soybean germplasms against defoliators. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 6(2): 1-7.

[51]Sharma, A.N. and Shukla, A.K. (1997). Effect of insect and disease control measure on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] yield in Madhya Pradesh. J. Oilseeds Res. 14: 324–326.

[52]Shriram (1996). Soybean research at Pantnagar experiment station. G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, pp85–106.

[53]Somogyi, M. (1952). Notes on sugar determination. J. Biol. Chem. 195: 19–23.

[54]Thortsteinson, A.J. (1960). Host selection in phyto phagous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 5: 193-218.

[55]War, A.R.; et al (2011). Jasmonic acid- mediated induced resistance in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) against Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Plant Growth Regul. 30: 512–523.

[56]War, A.R. (2012a). Constitutive and Induced Resistance to Insect Pests in Groundnut and Their Potential for Pest Management (Doctoral dissertation, University of Madras).

[57]War, A.R.; et al (2012b). Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores. Plant Signal. Behav. 7(10): 1306–1320.

[58]War, A.R.; et al (2014). Induced resistance to Helicoverpa armigera through exogenous application of jasmonic acid and salicylic acid in groundnut, Arachis hypogaea. Pest Manag. Sci. 1002(10): 3764.

[59]War, A.R.; et al (2015b). Induced resistance to Helicoverpa armigera through exogenous application of jasmonic acid and salicylic acid in groundnut, Arachis hypogaea. Pest Manag. Sci. 71(1): 72-82.

[60]Yang, X.T.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Joyce, D.; Huang, X.M.; Xu, L.Y. and Pang, X.Q. (2009). Characterization of chlorophyll degradation in banana and plantain during ripening at high temperature. Food Chem.114(2): 383-390.

Abstract

Keywords

References